[vtkusers] Re: Packaging vtk: patents

[Kevin H. Hobbs]

On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 09:45 -0700, Wylie, Brian wrote:
> All,
> 
> Kitware will certainly chime in here... I think hardly anyone is around
> (holiday vacations and all...) but this should be no problem. The only
> issue (to my knowledge) is the mpeg2 writer, everything else in VTK
> should have no restrictions/patents/bad licenses etc...
> 
> I agree, having VTK as part of the Fedora distribution would be super
> duper.. :)

Oops, sorry for sending my previous message off list.

Where should a spec file live? Do we want to make our own spec file to
live in the VTK and Paraview CVS? Do we want to submit a spec file to
Fedora and let them maintain it? 

They have CMake in extras, what other build requires do we have?

Can you tell I think this is a good idea as well?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.vtk.org/pipermail/vtkusers/attachments/20061228/7428be5a/attachment.pgp>