[vtkusers] Re: Packaging vtk: patents

[Wylie, Brian]

All,

Kitware will certainly chime in here... I think hardly anyone is around
(holiday vacations and all...) but this should be no problem. The only
issue (to my knowledge) is the mpeg2 writer, everything else in VTK
should have no restrictions/patents/bad licenses etc...

I agree, having VTK as part of the Fedora distribution would be super
duper.. :)

  Brian Wylie - Org 1424
  Sandia National Laboratories
  MS 0822 - Building 880/A1-J
  (505)844-2238 FAX(505)845-0833                       
       ____                  _    __
      / __ \____  _________ | |  / (_)__ _      __ 
     / /_/ / __ `/ ___/ __ `/ | / / / _ \ | /| / /
    / ____/ /_/ / /  / /_/ /| |/ / /  __/ |/ |/ /
   /_/    \__,_/_/   \__,_/ |___/_/\___/|__/|__/

                                    Unleash the Beast
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: vtkusers-bounces+bnwylie=sandia.gov at vtk.org 
> [mailto:vtkusers-bounces+bnwylie=sandia.gov at vtk.org] On 
> Behalf Of Ed Hill
> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 9:30 AM
> To: Axel Thimm
> Cc: Ken Martin; kitware at kitware.com; vtkusers at vtk.org; 
> Carl.Horton at med.ge.com
> Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Re: Packaging vtk: patents
> 
> On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:54:41 +0100 Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net>
> wrote:
> > you are referring to the mpeg part, which can still be removed for 
> > packaging purposes (and indeed in upcoming vtk releases it would be 
> > nice to keep it as a separate tarball).
> > 
> > But what about the other patents regarding some algorithms like 
> > Marching Cubes and friends? There is a FAQ entry on this:
> > 
> > http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ#What_is_the_deal_with_the_patents
> > 
> > But it refers to vtk4 and mentions the Patented subfolder 
> which does 
> > not exist anymore. Have all these patented algorithms either
> > 
> > o expired
> > o been replaced by non-patented equivalents o are waived 
> for vtk use?
> > 
> > IANAL, but probably the patents held by Kitware are not a 
> problem as 
> > they are releasing the software under an open source license 
> > themselves. But what about patents by the General Electric Company?
> > 
> > Please help me get the patent issue resolved so vtk can 
> become part of 
> > Fedora. Thanks!
> 
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> As a Fedora user and software developer I earnestly hope that 
> VTK can (in some form--perhaps with some parts omitted?) be 
> included with the Fedora distribution.  Convenient VTK RPMs 
> will make it _MUCH_ easier for me and other developers to 
> learn about, create, and distribute applications that use VTK.
> 
> And, even if VTK cannot be (re-)distributed by the Fedora 
> Project, it would still be nice to see an updated VTK FAQ 
> entry that better explains the current patent situation.
> 
> Many thanks to the VTK developers and to Axel -- and best 
> wishes for the New Year!
> 
> Ed
> 
> ps - It would be so nice to see VTK included in Fedora in 2007.
>      I would love to introduce new users and developers to VTK 
>      starting with a single simple command such as:
> 
>         yum install 'vtk*'
> 
>      which would automatically [auto-magically? :-)] install all 
>      the bits they need to get started with it on their Linux
>      machines.
> 
> 
> --
> Edward H. Hill III, PhD  |  ed at eh3.com  |  http://eh3.com/
>