[vtk-developers] Python wrapped void pointers

[David Lonie]

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:07 PM, David Gobbi <david.gobbi at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 5:41 PM, David Cole <DLRdave at aol.com> wrote:
>
>> So can callers now pass "_f02100_p_void" instead of the formerly
>> accepted "_f02100_void_p" ... ?
>
>
> Yes.  The whole point of the "void_p" was compatibility with SWIG, but SWIG
> itself switched to "p_void" many years ago.  VTK is just catching up...
>

Ok, thanks for the quick answer! I'll pass this along.

Dave
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/vtk-developers/attachments/20150224/c8c38e23/attachment.html>