[vtk-developers] Python wrapped void pointers

[David Gobbi]

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 5:41 PM, David Cole <DLRdave at aol.com> wrote:

> So can callers now pass "_f02100_p_void" instead of the formerly
> accepted "_f02100_void_p" ... ?


Yes.  The whole point of the "void_p" was compatibility with SWIG, but SWIG
itself switched to "p_void" many years ago.  VTK is just catching up...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/vtk-developers/attachments/20150223/6a0dbd26/attachment-0001.html>