[vtk-developers] Code review request: biquadratic quadinterpolation

Marcus D. Hanwell marcus.hanwell at kitware.com
Fri Jan 24 13:57:26 EST 2014


Hi John,

Thanks for your input - I really appreciate it. I will see if I hear
back from the contact David Thompson pointed out, and also try to find
some time to look at the vtkQuadraticQuad to ensure they are
consistent.

Marcus

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 6:21 PM, John Platt <jcplatt at dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
>
> I tested this change using 5.10 and it did not affect colour mapping,
> cutting or clipping. Unfortunately, I don't do any probing so I cannot check
> this.
>
> There would appear to be a dependency on the starting point for the linear
> quads with the 'adjust parametric coordinates' section in
> EvaluatePosition(). Here, the parametric coordinates from the linear quad
> are converted to parametric coordinates in the quadratic quad. The origins
> of each linear quad are as follows ...
>
>  (    0,    0 ) - point 0
>  ( 0.5,    0 )            4
>  ( 0.5, 0.5 )            8
>  (    0, 0.5 )            7
>
> So I would say that the proposed change is consistent with these origins.
>
> vtkQuadraticQuad uses the same linear quads as the old vtkBiQuadraticQuad so
> it could be a problem here also.
>
> HTH
>
> John.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marcus D. Hanwell"
> <marcus.hanwell at kitware.com>
> To: "David Thompson" <david.thompson at kitware.com>
> Cc: "VTK Developers" <vtk-developers at vtk.org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 9:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [vtk-developers] Code review request: biquadratic
> quadinterpolation
>
>
>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 3:48 PM, David Thompson
>> <david.thompson at kitware.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Marcus,
>>>
>>>> There is a topic on Gerrit I am having trouble finding a reviewer for,
>>>> http://review.source.kitware.com/#/t/3848/
>>>
>>>
>>> Soeren Gebbert (soerengebbert at googlemail.com) is the original developer.
>>> I'm really swamped right now, but it would be great to verify with Sandia
>>> that the change does not mess with the Exodus reader's numbering of nodes
>>> within the cell... several changes have done so in the past.
>>>
>> It would be nice to figure out what the expected behavior is too,
>> because this doesn't break any tests I can see. It is a single line
>> change, I can email the original developer but don't have much more
>> time I can put into this.
>>
>> Marcus
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
>>
>>
>
>



More information about the vtk-developers mailing list