[vtk-developers] Removing the vtkstd headers from VTK master - using STL directly

Bill Lorensen bill.lorensen at gmail.com
Tue Dec 13 11:55:51 EST 2011


I think you should keep the old headers around for backward
compatibility. You could stick warning pragmas in the headers.

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Marcus D. Hanwell
<marcus.hanwell at kitware.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just pushed a topic to reviewtest that removes vtkstd from VTK. For
> testing purposes I removed the generation of vtkstd altogether, but
> that could be modified.
>
> http://reviewtest.source.kitware.com:81/#/t/31/
>
> This seems to compile for me, and was done largely using a Python
> script and a little regex. Are there objections to me merging this
> topic in? Should the vtkstd headers be generated for legacy purposes,
> I know at least ParaView (which I can fix) is using vtkstd in some
> places.
>
> I could also use some pointers from David Gobbi, as I suspect what I
> did to the wrapper code was not quite right.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Marcus
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
>



-- 
Unpaid intern in BillsBasement at noware dot com



More information about the vtk-developers mailing list