[vtk-developers] VTK containers are gone; long live VTK containers
Prabhu Ramachandran
prabhu at aero.iitm.ernet.in
Tue Jan 7 21:18:28 EST 2003
>>>>> "KM" == Ken Martin <ken.martin at kitware.com> writes:
KM> This was an ongoing decision that had to be made before the
KM> release. If VTK 4.2 included Andy's containers then we would
KM> have to support them for all future versions of VTK. The
KM> driver was not so much addition of STL as do we remove Andy's
KM> containers prior to release.
Yes, but it is a last minute change nonetheless and a pretty big
change at that. This deal of using STL has been going on for a long
time. I myself argued for STL way back in Dec. 2001 (perhaps even
earlier). However, moving to STL suddenly without *any* prior
discussion on the mailing list before a release is certainly
surprising.
[snip]
KM> You are talking about adding a new class which is a different
KM> situation and hopefully not a double standard. You are
KM> handling the gl2ps issue correctly and doing a good job of
KM> communicating on it.
Ok. Thanks. I'll hold off till VTK 4.2 is released then.
Also, I think we'd all appreciate if you can give us a rough idea of
what the release plan is like. A rough time schedule will do. Then
we'd know what is coming up and I would know when I can commit the new
class.
cheers,
prabhu
More information about the vtk-developers
mailing list