[Paraview] difference in the output of co-processing

[Andy Bauer]

Hi Ufuk,

Thanks for checking this out. Did you try out saving the trace as a pvsm
file? Did you get the correct result when loading the pvsm file back or not?

Can you share the data set and the generated pvsm file and the Python state
file?

Thanks,
Andy



On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 3:50 AM, Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu (BE) <
u.utku.turuncoglu at be.itu.edu.tr> wrote:

> Hi Andy,
>
> No, i am using same PV installation in both case under same server.
>
> As you suggested, i saved the state in Python format and run under GUI
> (Tools > Python Shell > Run Script). It basically opens a new RenderView
> and places the color bars like in co-processing output (misplaced, thinner
> and smaller) and does not show anything about the rest of the
> visualization. It just have color bars but i could see the correct pipeline
> in the pipeline browser. It is little bit weird. If i am doing something
> wrong, please let me know.
>
> Also, i did not modify the default config settings of the GUI and if you
> want me to check any specific option, please let me know.
>
> Thank for your help,
> Regards,
>
> --ufuk
>
> On 02/01/2017 18:50, Andy Bauer wrote:
>
> Hi Ufuk,
>
> I'm not sure what is causing the difference. I'm guessing not all of the
> information for the view is saved in the state. Any chance that you're
> using different versions of ParaView for the GUI and Catalyst generated
> images? I see that the Python script is specifying that it was generated in
> a PV 5.2 release candidate.
>
> If it's the same version of PV then you can test the state mechanism in PV
> by saving the state as both a Python script as well as a pvsm file. After
> that, try generating the image by loading the pvsm state file and running
> the Python state file in the GUI.
>
> Another possibility is that there are some config settings in the GUI that
> aren't used in Catalyst. If you don't mind helping narrow down the cause of
> the issue we can put in a bug report for this.
>
> Thanks,
> Andy
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu (BE) <
> u.utku.turuncoglu at be.itu.edu.tr> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to use Paraview co-processing component to create
>> visualization from custom model. The problem is that the color bars are
>> misplaced and also smaller and thinner in the co-processing output (saved
>> png file) if i compare it with direct visualization from Paraview. I am
>> attaching sample png files for both case and also Python file that is used
>> for the co-processing. I just wonder that is it possible to fix it easily?
>> It might be a bug but i am not sure.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Regards,
>>
>> --ufuk
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>
>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20170103/a1b6e470/attachment.html>