[Paraview] difference in the output of co-processing

[Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu (BE)]

Hi Andy,

No, i am using same PV installation in both case under same server.

As you suggested, i saved the state in Python format and run under GUI 
(Tools > Python Shell > Run Script). It basically opens a new RenderView 
and places the color bars like in co-processing output (misplaced, 
thinner and smaller) and does not show anything about the rest of the 
visualization. It just have color bars but i could see the correct 
pipeline in the pipeline browser. It is little bit weird. If i am doing 
something wrong, please let me know.

Also, i did not modify the default config settings of the GUI and if you 
want me to check any specific option, please let me know.

Thank for your help,
Regards,

--ufuk

On 02/01/2017 18:50, Andy Bauer wrote:
> Hi Ufuk,
>
> I'm not sure what is causing the difference. I'm guessing not all of 
> the information for the view is saved in the state. Any chance that 
> you're using different versions of ParaView for the GUI and Catalyst 
> generated images? I see that the Python script is specifying that it 
> was generated in a PV 5.2 release candidate.
>
> If it's the same version of PV then you can test the state mechanism 
> in PV by saving the state as both a Python script as well as a pvsm 
> file. After that, try generating the image by loading the pvsm state 
> file and running the Python state file in the GUI.
>
> Another possibility is that there are some config settings in the GUI 
> that aren't used in Catalyst. If you don't mind helping narrow down 
> the cause of the issue we can put in a bug report for this.
>
> Thanks,
> Andy
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu (BE) 
> <u.utku.turuncoglu at be.itu.edu.tr 
> <mailto:u.utku.turuncoglu at be.itu.edu.tr>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     I am trying to use Paraview co-processing component to create
>     visualization from custom model. The problem is that the color
>     bars are
>     misplaced and also smaller and thinner in the co-processing output
>     (saved
>     png file) if i compare it with direct visualization from Paraview.
>     I am
>     attaching sample png files for both case and also Python file that
>     is used
>     for the co-processing. I just wonder that is it possible to fix it
>     easily?
>     It might be a bug but i am not sure.
>
>     Thanks,
>     Regards,
>
>     --ufuk
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Powered by www.kitware.com <http://www.kitware.com>
>
>     Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>     http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>     <http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html>
>
>     Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>     http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView <http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView>
>
>     Search the list archives at:
>     http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>     <http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView>
>
>     Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>     http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>     <http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20170103/52318478/attachment.html>