[Paraview] Different visualization result using serial or parallel ParaView ...

[Andy Bauer]

Hi Stefan,

Thanks for the bug issue report. There is a potential fix in VTK at
https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/merge_requests/2504

I am optimistic that this will  make it into the upcomgin ParaView 5.3
release.

Thanks,
Andy

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:35 AM, Stefan Melber <Stefan.Melber at dlr.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> amendment: the test case i send to you also crashes using the D31-filter:
>
> Executing with: Executing with: 0
> Executing with: 0
> Executing with: 0
> Executing with: 0
> Executing with: 0
> Executing with: 0
> Executing with: 0
> 0
>
> ============================================================
> =======================
> =   BAD TERMINATION OF ONE OF YOUR APPLICATION PROCESSES
> =   PID 23833 RUNNING AT bsastf670os
> =   EXIT CODE: 139
> =   CLEANING UP REMAINING PROCESSES
> =   YOU CAN IGNORE THE BELOW CLEANUP MESSAGES
> ============================================================
> =======================
> YOUR APPLICATION TERMINATED WITH THE EXIT STRING: Segmentation fault
> (signal 11)
> This typically refers to a problem with your application.
> Please see the FAQ page for debugging suggestions
>
> This now looks like a bug ;-)
>
>      Stefan
>
> Stefan,
>
> Attached is a fixed state file. Since the file didn't have ghost-cell
> information, the filters like "Compute Derivatives" didn't produce correct
> result at the process boundary cells. By putting a "Ghost Cell Generator"
> filter in the pipeline, one can address that issue.
>
> Utkarsh
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit <
> utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com> wrote:
>
>> That's odd. Stefan, can you send me the dataset please? I'll have it
>> looked into.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Utkarsh
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 4:04 AM, Stefan Melber <Stefan.Melber at dlr.de>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> during visualization of vortices i found a bug (or feature?) of
>>> ParaView: running the case in serial mode the results look fine. However,
>>> doing the same in parallel mode (e.g. 8 cores) the picture looks "ugly".
>>> Has anyone seen such an effect running in parallel? I am using the current
>>> version (v5.2.0) on a Linux 64bit machine with a Quadro 4000 graphics card.
>>>
>>> Attached there are two pics showing the effect, a picture of the used
>>> pipeline and the restart file...
>>>
>>> The test-data can be send to you for testing - i just need a
>>> email-address to send it to.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>>      Stefan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>>
>>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/
> opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20170221/4a5d50eb/attachment.html>