[Paraview] Different visualization result using serial or parallel ParaView ...

[Stefan Melber]

Hi,

amendment: the test case i send to you also crashes using the D31-filter:

Executing with: Executing with: 0
Executing with: 0
Executing with: 0
Executing with: 0
Executing with: 0
Executing with: 0
Executing with: 0
0

===================================================================================
=   BAD TERMINATION OF ONE OF YOUR APPLICATION PROCESSES
=   PID 23833 RUNNING AT bsastf670os
=   EXIT CODE: 139
=   CLEANING UP REMAINING PROCESSES
=   YOU CAN IGNORE THE BELOW CLEANUP MESSAGES
===================================================================================
YOUR APPLICATION TERMINATED WITH THE EXIT STRING: Segmentation fault 
(signal 11)
This typically refers to a problem with your application.
Please see the FAQ page for debugging suggestions

This now looks like a bug ;-)

      Stefan

> Stefan,
>
> Attached is a fixed state file. Since the file didn't have ghost-cell 
> information, the filters like "Compute Derivatives" didn't produce 
> correct result at the process boundary cells. By putting a "Ghost Cell 
> Generator" filter in the pipeline, one can address that issue.
>
> Utkarsh
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit 
> <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com <mailto:utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com>> wrote:
>
>     That's odd. Stefan, can you send me the dataset please? I'll have
>     it looked into.
>
>     Thanks
>     Utkarsh
>
>     On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 4:04 AM, Stefan Melber
>     <Stefan.Melber at dlr.de <mailto:Stefan.Melber at dlr.de>> wrote:
>
>         Hi,
>
>
>         during visualization of vortices i found a bug (or feature?)
>         of ParaView: running the case in serial mode the results look
>         fine. However, doing the same in parallel mode (e.g. 8 cores)
>         the picture looks "ugly". Has anyone seen such an effect
>         running in parallel? I am using the current version (v5.2.0)
>         on a Linux 64bit machine with a Quadro 4000 graphics card.
>
>         Attached there are two pics showing the effect, a picture of
>         the used pipeline and the restart file...
>
>         The test-data can be send to you for testing - i just need a
>         email-address to send it to.
>
>         Best regards,
>
>              Stefan
>
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Powered by www.kitware.com <http://www.kitware.com>
>
>         Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>         http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>         <http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html>
>
>         Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>         http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>         <http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView>
>
>         Search the list archives at:
>         http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>         <http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView>
>
>         Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>         http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>         <http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview>
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20170210/47d7f822/attachment.html>