[Paraview] volume rendering with Catalyst ...
Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu (BE)
u.utku.turuncoglu at be.itu.edu.tr
Thu May 5 01:46:57 EDT 2016
Hi,
Actually, i am using same ParaView installation (under Mac OS) to create
the Catalyst script and compiling the model code. So, OpenGL backend
must be consistent. In any case, i'll try your suggestion and let you
know about it.
Regards,
--ufuk
On 04/05/16 22:37, Andy Bauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are you generating the Catalyst script with PV built with the OpenGL2
> backend and then linking with a version of Catalyst built with the
> OpenGL1 backend? I'd guess that this is the problem.
>
> To isolate the issue further, you can do a Python trace in the GUI to
> see if you get the same issue when you run pvpython with that script.
>
> Best,
> Andy
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu (BE)
> <u.utku.turuncoglu at be.itu.edu.tr
> <mailto:u.utku.turuncoglu at be.itu.edu.tr>> wrote:
>
> Hi Cory,
>
> Do you think that it is a bug in Catalyst side. In this case, i am
> running the code as follows
>
> export
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/progs/paraview-5.0.0/lib:${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}
> export
> DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/progs/paraview-5.0.0/lib:${DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH}
> mpirun -np 12 ./main.x
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
> --ufuk
>
>
>
> On 29/04/16 16:58, Cory Quammen wrote:
>
> It indeed looks like the scalar opacity function is not being
> set up
> properly when using Catalyst. Looking at your script, it looks
> like it
> should be, though.
>
> Could you describe how you are running this with Catalyst?
>
> Thanks,
> Cory
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu (BE)
> <u.utku.turuncoglu at be.itu.edu.tr
> <mailto:u.utku.turuncoglu at be.itu.edu.tr>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I had a problem in Catalyst when i run a visualization
> pipeline with volume
> rendering. The attached figures shows the problem and
> belong to same
> visualization with and without Catalyst. In my case, the
> co-processing
> Python script (dvr.py) is generated from multi-block
> dataset and the
> Catalyst code uses MPI code to define multi-block dataset
> also. So, it is
> consistent in both side. The visualization pipeline
> includes Transform and
> MergeBlocks filters to create the final image and mapper
> is set as Bunyk Ray
> Cast. It seems that there is a problem in the color
> transfer function but i
> am not sure. I also test with different mapper such as
> projected-tetra but
> the result is same. I just wonder that did you see any
> similar problem
> before.
>
> Regards,
>
> Istanbul Technical University
> Informatics Institute
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com <http://www.kitware.com>
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at:
> http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com <http://www.kitware.com>
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20160505/9265484e/attachment.html>
More information about the ParaView
mailing list