[Paraview] volume rendering with Catalyst ...

Andy Bauer andy.bauer at kitware.com
Wed May 4 15:37:34 EDT 2016


Hi,

Are you generating the Catalyst script with PV built with the OpenGL2
backend and then linking with a version of Catalyst built with the OpenGL1
backend? I'd guess that this is the problem.

To isolate the issue further, you can do a Python trace in the GUI to see
if you get the same issue when you run pvpython with that script.

Best,
Andy

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu (BE) <
u.utku.turuncoglu at be.itu.edu.tr> wrote:

> Hi Cory,
>
> Do you think that it is a bug in Catalyst side. In this case, i am running
> the code as follows
>
> export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/progs/paraview-5.0.0/lib:${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}
> export DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/progs/paraview-5.0.0/lib:${DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH}
> mpirun -np 12 ./main.x
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
> --ufuk
>
>
>
> On 29/04/16 16:58, Cory Quammen wrote:
>
>> It indeed looks like the scalar opacity function is not being set up
>> properly when using Catalyst. Looking at your script, it looks like it
>> should be, though.
>>
>> Could you describe how you are running this with Catalyst?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Cory
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu (BE)
>> <u.utku.turuncoglu at be.itu.edu.tr> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I had a problem in Catalyst when i run a visualization pipeline with
>>> volume
>>> rendering. The attached figures shows the problem and belong to same
>>> visualization with and without Catalyst. In my case, the co-processing
>>> Python script (dvr.py) is generated from multi-block dataset and the
>>> Catalyst code uses MPI code to define multi-block dataset also. So, it is
>>> consistent in both side. The visualization pipeline includes Transform
>>> and
>>> MergeBlocks filters to create the final image and mapper is set as Bunyk
>>> Ray
>>> Cast. It seems that there is a problem in the color transfer function
>>> but i
>>> am not sure. I also test with different mapper such as projected-tetra
>>> but
>>> the result is same. I just wonder that did you see any similar problem
>>> before.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Istanbul Technical University
>>> Informatics Institute
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>>
>>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20160504/822b2427/attachment.html>


More information about the ParaView mailing list