[Paraview] [EXTERNAL] Re: temporal threshold

[timcfagan .]

Thanks, I see from Ken's comment that my problem is a changing topology.
Some of the nodes in the grid will become active over time... I've tried
sectioning away the regions that become active, but this didn't work... Is
there a better way to get around topology change for this filter?

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Scott, W Alan <wascott at sandia.gov> wrote:

> I stand corrected.  Thanks for the feedback.
>
> Alan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Thompson [mailto:david.thompson at kitware.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 11:15 AM
> To: Scott, W Alan
> Cc: Moreland, Kenneth; David E DeMarle; timcfagan .; paraview at paraview.org
> Subject: Re: [Paraview] [EXTERNAL] Re: temporal threshold
>
> > You may be right.  I am just dredging up old memories from a few years
> ago.  David Thompson should remember – he helped write the filter.  David?
>
> I am sure that at one point it worked in parallel, with the caveat that
> samples of points or point-data will over-represent values on process
> boundaries (because ParaView does not have knowledge of how many processes
> hold any given process-boundary point).
>
> Err, and as I see Ken just mentioned, I only worked on the statistics
> filters that Temporal Statistics uses under the hood.
>
>         David
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20150127/23f73dfb/attachment.html>