[Paraview] Where do I send Xdmf bugs/patches?

[Biddiscombe, John A.]

Dominik,

we're not very high on the list of priorities for the xdmf people.
However the xdmf2 rewrite that is available from
git://public.kitware.com/Xdmf2.git
is stable (and active it seems) - I assume this is not the one you are referring to (wrt paraview), and I am hoping soon to start using it instead of the paraview version of the old xdmf - which is what I expect you are referring to - we have a number of tweaks to Xdmf which would benefit from this new version.

the vtkXdmfReader in paraview would need to be rewritten to use the new Xdmf API.

If you're interested in joining forces to work on it - then I'll put aside some time over the Christmas break.

JB


-----Original Message-----
From: paraview-bounces at paraview.org [mailto:paraview-bounces at paraview.org] On Behalf Of Dominik Szczerba
Sent: 14 December 2011 14:42
To: Utkarsh Ayachit
Cc: ParaView list
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Where do I send Xdmf bugs/patches?

Hi Utkarsh,

No, there was no feedback on many of my latest bug reports, neither were they fixed in the official branch... so I thought it was dead and switched to the PV branch. I can not even find anymore where the official repo is, the one found by google on http://www.xdmf.org/index.php/Get_Xdmf seems to point to some abandoned version.

For a very long time I remain confused which version is the leading one, and which one I should engage in and use as a base for proposed patches, and where to send them, because no one listens on the xdmf mailing list... Please, can you clarify the situation?

Regards,
Dominik

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com> wrote:
> Dominik,
>
> Are these issues already fixed on Xdmf's official branch? The plan is 
> to sync up ParaView's branch with Xdmf's periodically. Feel free to 
> report bugs and patches on the ParaView bug tracker. However, if the 
> issues have not been addressed in the official Xdmf branch, they will 
> have to be approved by the Xdmf team as well.
>
> Utkarsh
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Dominik Szczerba <dominik at itis.ethz.ch> wrote:
>> I have recently (relatively successfully) switched to the PV's Xdmf 
>> branch from the original branch. Where do I report bugs and 
>> contribute patches for this branch and what are the odds for them to 
>> be eventually accepted ?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Dominik
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview