[Paraview] Where do I send Xdmf bugs/patches?

[Dominik Szczerba]

Aparently my mail did not make it to the list, so I will repeat.
Please see below:

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Biddiscombe, John A. <biddisco at cscs.ch> wrote:
> Dominik,
>
> we're not very high on the list of priorities for the xdmf people.
> However the xdmf2 rewrite that is available from
> git://public.kitware.com/Xdmf2.git
> is stable (and active it seems) - I assume this is not the one you are referring to (wrt paraview), and I am hoping soon to start using it instead of the paraview version of the old xdmf - which is what I expect you are referring to - we have a number of tweaks to Xdmf which would benefit from this new version.
>
> the vtkXdmfReader in paraview would need to be rewritten to use the new Xdmf API.
>

I was referring to Xdmf2 subfolder in PV git clone that I did
following "users start here" wiki page. Is
git://public.kitware.com/Xdmf2.git still something else? I am quite
confused... Is it all explained somewhere on a wiki page?

> If you're interested in joining forces to work on it - then I'll put aside some time over the Christmas break.

What are the objectives of this branch and how will it be
related/synced/contributed to the other branches? I am interested to
join Xdmf development provided that this would have a solid future,
like in VTK or Paraview.

Thanks and best regards,
Dominik


>
> JB
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: paraview-bounces at paraview.org [mailto:paraview-bounces at paraview.org] On Behalf Of Dominik Szczerba
> Sent: 14 December 2011 14:42
> To: Utkarsh Ayachit
> Cc: ParaView list
> Subject: Re: [Paraview] Where do I send Xdmf bugs/patches?
>
> Hi Utkarsh,
>
> No, there was no feedback on many of my latest bug reports, neither were they fixed in the official branch... so I thought it was dead and switched to the PV branch. I can not even find anymore where the official repo is, the one found by google on http://www.xdmf.org/index.php/Get_Xdmf seems to point to some abandoned version.
>
> For a very long time I remain confused which version is the leading one, and which one I should engage in and use as a base for proposed patches, and where to send them, because no one listens on the xdmf mailing list... Please, can you clarify the situation?
>
> Regards,
> Dominik
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com> wrote:
>> Dominik,
>>
>> Are these issues already fixed on Xdmf's official branch? The plan is
>> to sync up ParaView's branch with Xdmf's periodically. Feel free to
>> report bugs and patches on the ParaView bug tracker. However, if the
>> issues have not been addressed in the official Xdmf branch, they will
>> have to be approved by the Xdmf team as well.
>>
>> Utkarsh
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Dominik Szczerba <dominik at itis.ethz.ch> wrote:
>>> I have recently (relatively successfully) switched to the PV's Xdmf
>>> branch from the original branch. Where do I report bugs and
>>> contribute patches for this branch and what are the odds for them to
>>> be eventually accepted ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Dominik
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>