[Paraview] poor man's particle tracer

Berk Geveci berk.geveci at kitware.com
Sun Feb 24 10:01:09 EST 2008


What about streamline -> python programmable filter -> glyph? The
programmable filter has to behave as a time source. It can do that by
setting, err, I think, TIME_VALUES() and TIME_RANGE() keys in
RequestInformation() and responding to , err, UPDATE_TIME_VALUES() in
RequestData(). It could extract the nth point in one or more
streamlines where n is the time step. You can then animate it using
the standard animation support (I hope).

-berk

On 2/24/08, Charl Botha <c.p.botha at tudelft.nl> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>  I'm trying to create, for educational purposes, a poor man's particle
>  tracer with ParaView.  I have a static vector dataset, so I see two
>  options:
>
>  * by using a probe and warp vector filter, I can get particles being
>  advected by one step.  Is there some way of taking the output of the
>  first step and feeding it back into the network, so I can recursively
>  advect my particles?
>  * is there some way of using the animation functionality to move a
>  particle (or glyph or something) along the trajectory of a streamline?
>
>  Are there any other options?
>
>  For the moment I'm assuming no access to the ParticleTracer (as this
>  is not working 100% in the ParaView 3.2.1 release, as discussed in a
>  previous mail thread).
>
>  Thanks for any help,
>  Charl
>  _______________________________________________
>  ParaView mailing list
>  ParaView at paraview.org
>  http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>


More information about the ParaView mailing list