[Paraview] poor man's particle tracer
Berk Geveci
berk.geveci at kitware.com
Sun Feb 24 10:01:09 EST 2008
What about streamline -> python programmable filter -> glyph? The
programmable filter has to behave as a time source. It can do that by
setting, err, I think, TIME_VALUES() and TIME_RANGE() keys in
RequestInformation() and responding to , err, UPDATE_TIME_VALUES() in
RequestData(). It could extract the nth point in one or more
streamlines where n is the time step. You can then animate it using
the standard animation support (I hope).
-berk
On 2/24/08, Charl Botha <c.p.botha at tudelft.nl> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I'm trying to create, for educational purposes, a poor man's particle
> tracer with ParaView. I have a static vector dataset, so I see two
> options:
>
> * by using a probe and warp vector filter, I can get particles being
> advected by one step. Is there some way of taking the output of the
> first step and feeding it back into the network, so I can recursively
> advect my particles?
> * is there some way of using the animation functionality to move a
> particle (or glyph or something) along the trajectory of a streamline?
>
> Are there any other options?
>
> For the moment I'm assuming no access to the ParticleTracer (as this
> is not working 100% in the ParaView 3.2.1 release, as discussed in a
> previous mail thread).
>
> Thanks for any help,
> Charl
> _______________________________________________
> ParaView mailing list
> ParaView at paraview.org
> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
More information about the ParaView
mailing list