[Insight-developers] Do we need a 3.20.1 tag?

Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin jchris.fillionr at kitware.com
Tue Oct 25 18:21:44 EDT 2011


All set - Slicer4 now checks out ITK v3.20.1 from github.com/Kitware/ITK.git
See
https://github.com/Slicer/Slicer/commit/52f1e02c56a64f0188dbe31aa0643c3e23888a4e

Jc

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com>wrote:

> JC,
>
> Can you switch over slicer4 to use the official itk repo and the new tag?
>
> Bill
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Brad King <brad.king at kitware.com> wrote:
>
>> On 10/25/2011 09:22 AM, Brad King wrote:
>> > On 10/24/2011 09:42 PM, Matt McCormick wrote:
>> >> I will talk with Luis and Brad K. tomorrow about cutting a release.
>> >> It will be the first one since the Git transition, so after the
>> >> mechanics are worked out, they will hopefully come fast and easy.
>> >
>> > I merged Arnaud's fix for clang 3.0 this morning.  The release branch as
>> > of 389c6208 contains it plus all the other fixes from the last few days:
>> >
>> >   http://itk.org/gitweb?p=ITK.git;a=shortlog;h=389c6208
>> >
>> > If this version is acceptable for tagging I can make it v3.20.1.  Once
>> > the tag is in place then release tarballs and such can be created.
>> > Actually you should test if the desired tarballs can be crated from
>> > commit 389c6208 before we create the tag, just in case any tweaks are
>> > needed to the branch (since this is the first time with Git).
>>
>> http://itk.org/gitweb?p=ITK.git;a=tag;h=v3.20.1
>>
>> -Brad
>>
>
>


-- 
+1 919 869 8849
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/attachments/20111025/10237c1c/attachment.htm>


More information about the Insight-developers mailing list