[Insight-developers] Do we need a 3.20.1 tag?

[Bill Lorensen]

There is no ITK cvs. Is there?

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Steve Pieper <pieper at ibility.net> wrote:

> Hi Guys -
>
> Has this also been pushed back to ITK cvs?
>
> -Steve
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> JC,
>>
>> Can you switch over slicer4 to use the official itk repo and the new tag?
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Brad King <brad.king at kitware.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/25/2011 09:22 AM, Brad King wrote:
>>> > On 10/24/2011 09:42 PM, Matt McCormick wrote:
>>> >> I will talk with Luis and Brad K. tomorrow about cutting a release.
>>> >> It will be the first one since the Git transition, so after the
>>> >> mechanics are worked out, they will hopefully come fast and easy.
>>> >
>>> > I merged Arnaud's fix for clang 3.0 this morning.  The release branch
>>> as
>>> > of 389c6208 contains it plus all the other fixes from the last few
>>> days:
>>> >
>>> >   http://itk.org/gitweb?p=ITK.git;a=shortlog;h=389c6208
>>> >
>>> > If this version is acceptable for tagging I can make it v3.20.1.  Once
>>> > the tag is in place then release tarballs and such can be created.
>>> > Actually you should test if the desired tarballs can be crated from
>>> > commit 389c6208 before we create the tag, just in case any tweaks are
>>> > needed to the branch (since this is the first time with Git).
>>>
>>> http://itk.org/gitweb?p=ITK.git;a=tag;h=v3.20.1
>>>
>>> -Brad
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/attachments/20111025/b3eed8e4/attachment.htm>