[Insight-developers] Do we need a 3.20.1 tag?

[Bill Lorensen]

JC,

Among the patches are those from Stephen A's IO enhancements. As of now, all
of the Slicer specific patches have been merged into release.

Bill

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin <
jchris.fillionr at kitware.com> wrote:

> Hi Bill,
>
> It would be great to have a 3.20.1 tag, it will help regarding Slicer
> debian/linux packaging initiative leaded by Dominique Belhachemi.
>
> As a side note, all external projects within Slicer are referenced using a
> specific SVN rev / Git SHA1. This applied also for ITKv3. See
> https://github.com/Slicer/Slicer/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt#L199 and
> https://github.com/Slicer/Slicer/blob/master/SuperBuild/External_ITKv3.cmake#L35
> .
>
> Thanks
> Jc
>
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> There have been several patches to itk 3.20.0. They are currently
>> available in the release branch. Do we need a 3.20.1 tag so that projects
>> like Slicer4 can reference this tag? If they reference release, they might
>> be surprised when we release tikv4.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> +1 919 869 8849
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/attachments/20111024/86b251d6/attachment.htm>