[Insight-developers] Do we need a 3.20.1 tag?

[Arnaud Gelas]

Bill,

It'd be great to have this new tag!!

Once the following patch gets merged, gofigure2's superbuild (the  
application we develop here) would work with clang 3.0.

	http://review.source.kitware.com/#change,3140

My biased point of view,
Arnaud

On Oct 24, 2011, at 8:25 PM, Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin wrote:

> Hi Bill,
>
> It would be great to have a 3.20.1 tag, it will help regarding  
> Slicer debian/linux packaging initiative leaded by Dominique  
> Belhachemi.
>
> As a side note, all external projects within Slicer are referenced  
> using a specific SVN rev / Git SHA1. This applied also for ITKv3.  
> See https://github.com/Slicer/Slicer/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt#L199  
> and https://github.com/Slicer/Slicer/blob/master/SuperBuild/External_ITKv3.cmake 
> #L35.
>
> Thanks
> Jc
>
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com 
> > wrote:
> There have been several patches to itk 3.20.0. They are currently  
> available in the release branch. Do we need a 3.20.1 tag so that  
> projects like Slicer4 can reference this tag? If they reference  
> release, they might be surprised when we release tikv4.
>
> Bill
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> +1 919 869 8849
>
> <ATT00001.txt>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/attachments/20111024/9985ef00/attachment.htm>