[Insight-developers] [Insight-users] ITK 3.20 Release : Tagging Today.

[Luis Ibanez]

Way to talk Bill !

Everybody should be using Linux     :-)



BTW: Talking about Linux...
The build of LLVM in Linux came up
with a different set of failing tests.       :-/


* itkParallelSparseFieldLevelSetImageFilterTest (Failed)
* itkTransformIOTest (SEGFAULT)
* WatershedSegmentation1Test1 (Failed)
* WatershedSegmentation1Test2 (Failed)

http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewTest.php?onlyfailed&buildid=662912


This may be related to
the specific version of llvm...
or compilation flags...

It doesn't look like something we can fix today.

--

I'm proceeding to tag ITK 3.20 now...


     Luis


---------------------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com>wrote:

> I agree we should cut.
>
> Along with VS6,7 and Borland, maybe for ITKv4 we should stop
> supporting these flaky Macs!
>
> :*)
>
> Bill
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Bill, Sean,
> >
> >
> > Looking at the errors,
> >
> > There seems to be a pattern of NaNs
> > in basic computations.
> >
> >
> > We have:
> >
> > itkVectorConfidenceConnectedImageFilterTest
> >
> >
> > and
> >
> > itkChiSquareDistributionTest
> > This one is failing due to NANs:
> > http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=58348665&build=652081
> >
> >
> > itkGaussianDistributionTest
> > with more NaNs
> > http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=58348666&build=652081
> >
> >
> > itkTDistributionTest
> > with more NaNs
> > http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=58348667&build=652081
> >
> >
> > vnl_test_gamma
> > and more NANs
> > http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=58348663&build=652081
> >
> >
> > This last four test have in common that
> > they relate to basic math functions...
> >
> >
> >
> > I'll give it a shot at building with LLVM on Linux,
> > but... if there is nothing obvious in the first hour,
> > I will vote for cutting the release as it is,
> > and then patching ITK 3.20 for LLVM once
> > we figure out the source of the problem.
> >
> >
> >
> >     Any objections ?
> >
> >
> >            Luis
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> You should send a note to the developers list if your dashboard
> >> machine changes and disappears from the NightlyExpected. Sometimes we
> >> notice, but I guess we missed this one.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Sean McBride <sean at rogue-research.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:44:08 -0400, Bill Lorensen said:
> >> >
> >> >>I guess since they are not on the Nightly Expected builds, we did not
> >> >>see these. They started failing 13 days ago:
> >> >>http://www.cdash.org/CDash/index.php?project=Insight&date=2010-06-30
> >> >>but the changes that day don't seem related to the failures. Did
> >> >>something change in your environment?
> >> >
> >> > In fact, yes.  Between those days we updated that machine from Xcode
> >> > 3.2.2 to 3.2.3, which updated the compiler from:
> >> >
> >> > llvm-gcc 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5646) (LLVM build 2207.5)
> >> >
> >> > to
> >> >
> >> > llvm-gcc 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2326.10)
> >> >
> >> > I always note such changes in the comments at the top of the notes,
> >> > compare:
> >> >
> >> > <http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewNotes.php?buildid=651068>
> >> > <http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewNotes.php?buildid=652081>
> >> >
> >> > Though that can be easy to miss.  Is there a procedure there too?
> >> > Perhaps I should send an email whenever some significant config change
> >> > is made to a dashboard?
> >> >
> >> >>Also, it seems we have a process breakdown. Why aren't these on the
> >> >>Expected list?
> >> >
> >> > What's the correct way for me to request that?  I usually fire an
> email
> >> > to someone and it usually gets done, but I may not have for these
> >> > builds, or the receiver may not have acted up it.
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > ____________________________________________________________
> >> > Sean McBride, B. Eng                 sean at rogue-research.com
> >> > Rogue Research                        www.rogue-research.com
> >> > Mac Software Developer              Montréal, Québec, Canada
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/attachments/20100712/6ef97caf/attachment.htm>