[Insight-developers] [Insight-users] ITK 3.20 Release : Tagging Today.

[kent williams]

This looks like a definite case for enabling floating point exception traps
on platforms other that Borland, which I¹m working on ;-)


On 7/12/10 3:32 PM, "Luis Ibanez" <luis.ibanez at kitware.com> wrote:

> 
> Way to talk Bill !
> 
> Everybody should be using Linux     :-)
> 
> 
> 
> BTW: Talking about Linux...
> The build of LLVM in Linux came up
> with a different set of failing tests.       :-/
> 
> 
> * itkParallelSparseFieldLevelSetImageFilterTest (Failed)
> * itkTransformIOTest (SEGFAULT)
> * WatershedSegmentation1Test1 (Failed)
> * WatershedSegmentation1Test2 (Failed)
> 
> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewTest.php?onlyfailed&buildid=662912
> 
> 
> This may be related to
> the specific version of llvm...
> or compilation flags...
> 
> It doesn't look like something we can fix today.
> 
> --
> 
> I'm proceeding to tag ITK 3.20 now...
> 
> 
>      Luis 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> I agree we should cut.
>> 
>> Along with VS6,7 and Borland, maybe for ITKv4 we should stop
>> supporting these flaky Macs!
>> 
>> :*)
>> 
>> Bill
>> 
>> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Bill, Sean,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Looking at the errors,
>>> >
>>> > There seems to be a pattern of NaNs
>>> > in basic computations.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > We have:
>>> >
>>> > itkVectorConfidenceConnectedImageFilterTest
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > and
>>> >
>>> > itkChiSquareDistributionTest
>>> > This one is failing due to NANs:
>>> > http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=58348665&build=652081
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > itkGaussianDistributionTest
>>> > with more NaNs
>>> > http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=58348666&build=652081
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > itkTDistributionTest
>>> > with more NaNs
>>> > http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=58348667&build=652081
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > vnl_test_gamma
>>> > and more NANs
>>> > http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=58348663&build=652081
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > This last four test have in common that
>>> > they relate to basic math functions...
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I'll give it a shot at building with LLVM on Linux,
>>> > but... if there is nothing obvious in the first hour,
>>> > I will vote for cutting the release as it is,
>>> > and then patching ITK 3.20 for LLVM once
>>> > we figure out the source of the problem.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >     Any objections ?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >            Luis
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ------------------------------
>>> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> You should send a note to the developers list if your dashboard
>>>> >> machine changes and disappears from the NightlyExpected. Sometimes we
>>>> >> notice, but I guess we missed this one.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Sean McBride <sean at rogue-research.com>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>> >> > On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:44:08 -0400, Bill Lorensen said:
>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >>I guess since they are not on the Nightly Expected builds, we did
not
>>>>>> >> >>see these. They started failing 13 days ago:
>>>>>> >> >>http://www.cdash.org/CDash/index.php?project=Insight&date=2010-06-30
>>>>>> >> >>but the changes that day don't seem related to the failures. Did
>>>>>> >> >>something change in your environment?
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > In fact, yes.  Between those days we updated that machine from Xcode
>>>>> >> > 3.2.2 to 3.2.3, which updated the compiler from:
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > llvm-gcc 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5646) (LLVM build 2207.5)
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > to
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > llvm-gcc 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2326.10)
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > I always note such changes in the comments at the top of the notes,
>>>>> >> > compare:
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > <http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewNotes.php?buildid=651068>
>>>>> >> > <http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewNotes.php?buildid=652081>
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > Though that can be easy to miss.  Is there a procedure there too?
>>>>> >> > Perhaps I should send an email whenever some significant config >>>>>
change
>>>>> >> > is made to a dashboard?
>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >>Also, it seems we have a process breakdown. Why aren't these on the
>>>>>> >> >>Expected list?
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > What's the correct way for me to request that?  I usually fire an
>>>>> email
>>>>> >> > to someone and it usually gets done, but I may not have for these
>>>>> >> > builds, or the receiver may not have acted up it.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > Cheers,
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > --
>>>>> >> > ____________________________________________________________
>>>>> >> > Sean McBride, B. Eng                 sean at rogue-research.com
>>>>> >> > Rogue Research                        www.rogue-research.com
>>>>> <http://www.rogue-research.com>
>>>>> >> > Mac Software Developer              Montréal, Québec, Canada
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >
>>> >
>>> >
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
> 
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> 
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
> 
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
> 
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/attachments/20100712/1b1e35b7/attachment-0001.htm>