[Insight-developers] [Insight-users] ITK 3.20 Release : Tagging Today.

[Bill Lorensen]

I agree we should cut.

Along with VS6,7 and Borland, maybe for ITKv4 we should stop
supporting these flaky Macs!

:*)

Bill

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com> wrote:
>
> Bill, Sean,
>
>
> Looking at the errors,
>
> There seems to be a pattern of NaNs
> in basic computations.
>
>
> We have:
>
> itkVectorConfidenceConnectedImageFilterTest
>
>
> and
>
> itkChiSquareDistributionTest
> This one is failing due to NANs:
> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=58348665&build=652081
>
>
> itkGaussianDistributionTest
> with more NaNs
> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=58348666&build=652081
>
>
> itkTDistributionTest
> with more NaNs
> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=58348667&build=652081
>
>
> vnl_test_gamma
> and more NANs
> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=58348663&build=652081
>
>
> This last four test have in common that
> they relate to basic math functions...
>
>
>
> I'll give it a shot at building with LLVM on Linux,
> but... if there is nothing obvious in the first hour,
> I will vote for cutting the release as it is,
> and then patching ITK 3.20 for LLVM once
> we figure out the source of the problem.
>
>
>
>     Any objections ?
>
>
>            Luis
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> You should send a note to the developers list if your dashboard
>> machine changes and disappears from the NightlyExpected. Sometimes we
>> notice, but I guess we missed this one.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Sean McBride <sean at rogue-research.com>
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:44:08 -0400, Bill Lorensen said:
>> >
>> >>I guess since they are not on the Nightly Expected builds, we did not
>> >>see these. They started failing 13 days ago:
>> >>http://www.cdash.org/CDash/index.php?project=Insight&date=2010-06-30
>> >>but the changes that day don't seem related to the failures. Did
>> >>something change in your environment?
>> >
>> > In fact, yes.  Between those days we updated that machine from Xcode
>> > 3.2.2 to 3.2.3, which updated the compiler from:
>> >
>> > llvm-gcc 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5646) (LLVM build 2207.5)
>> >
>> > to
>> >
>> > llvm-gcc 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2326.10)
>> >
>> > I always note such changes in the comments at the top of the notes,
>> > compare:
>> >
>> > <http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewNotes.php?buildid=651068>
>> > <http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewNotes.php?buildid=652081>
>> >
>> > Though that can be easy to miss.  Is there a procedure there too?
>> > Perhaps I should send an email whenever some significant config change
>> > is made to a dashboard?
>> >
>> >>Also, it seems we have a process breakdown. Why aren't these on the
>> >>Expected list?
>> >
>> > What's the correct way for me to request that?  I usually fire an email
>> > to someone and it usually gets done, but I may not have for these
>> > builds, or the receiver may not have acted up it.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > --
>> > ____________________________________________________________
>> > Sean McBride, B. Eng                 sean at rogue-research.com
>> > Rogue Research                        www.rogue-research.com
>> > Mac Software Developer              Montréal, Québec, Canada
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>