[Insight-developers] Warnings on gelas.megason-lab.hms

Wes Turner wes.turner at kitware.com
Tue May 19 10:06:29 EDT 2009


No problem.
- Wes

On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Arnaud Gelas
<arnaud_gelas at hms.harvard.edu>wrote:

> Wes,
>
> I have just checked...
> I forgot to change in the file that I use with cron :-/...
>
> Arnaud
>
> Wes Turner wrote:
>
>> Arnaud,
>>
>> The -wshadow option is still showing up on gelas.megason-lab.hms ... does
>> the cache need to be cleared?
>>
>> - Wes
>>
>> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com<mailto:
>> bill.lorensen at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>    They should be CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS, not CMAKE_C_FLAGS.
>>
>>    On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Arnaud Gelas
>>    <arnaud_gelas at hms.harvard.edu
>>    <mailto:arnaud_gelas at hms.harvard.edu>> wrote:
>>    > Hi Wes,
>>    >
>>    > You're right, this is one of my machine. I can remove -Wshadow
>>    flag (no
>>    > problem, will be done for next nightly build)!
>>    > Note I have been asked couple of days ago to add these following
>>    flags for
>>    > compilation:
>>    >
>>    > -Wall -Wextra -Wformat=2 -Wno-format-nonliteral -Wunused
>>    > -Wpointer-arith -Winvalid-pch -Wcast-align -Wdisabled-optimization
>>    > -Woverloaded-virtual -Wshadow -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-null-sentinel
>>    >
>>    > I had to add -funit-at-a-time to remove error messages from gcc...
>>    >
>>    > Would it be possible to agree on the right flags to be used with
>>    gcc 4.3.2
>>    > (and other compiler) for nightly builds?
>>    >
>>    > I have just started a wiki page for this issue:
>>    > http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/Build_Instructions_for_Developers
>>    >
>>    > Arnaud
>>    >
>>    > Wes Turner wrote:
>>    >>
>>    >> Arnaud,
>>    >>
>>    >> We think this is one of your machines.  It is showing 587 compiler
>>    >> warnings on the latest nightly.  We think these are do to the
>>    -Wshadow
>>    >> flag on the build, seemingly due to the shadowing of global
>>    variables
>>    >> by local variables of the same name in the itkjpeg package.  After
>>    >> taking a look at the warnings, it doesn't look like these are real
>>    >> code deficiencies.  They seem more like poor coding style.
>>     Would you
>>    >> be able to remove the flag on the nightly submission, and maybe
>>    move
>>    >> it to an experimental?  Alternately, if you would like to fix the
>>    >> warnings, we would welcome the fixes.
>>    >>
>>    >> Thanks!
>>    >>
>>    >> - Wes
>>    >>
>>    >>
>>    >
>>    > _______________________________________________
>>    > Powered by www.kitware.com <http://www.kitware.com>
>>    >
>>    > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>    > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>    >
>>    > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>>    > http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>    >
>>    > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>    > http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>    >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Wesley D. Turner, Ph.D.
>> Kitware, Inc.
>> R&D Engineer
>> 28 Corporate Drive
>> Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
>> Phone: 518-371-3971 x120
>>
>
>


-- 
Wesley D. Turner, Ph.D.
Kitware, Inc.
R&D Engineer
28 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
Phone: 518-371-3971 x120
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/attachments/20090519/b1b4cbaf/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Insight-developers mailing list