[Insight-developers] Should the itkTclAppInit function be split out of itkTclAppInit.cxx?

[Kent Williams]

All I want to do is to have ITK available from TCL scripts, and have it 
be available in the way that it is most usable, and most likely to be 
the most standard wrapping method.  So Gaetan you are telling me that 
WrapITK is the way to go. Is that the consensus of the ITK developers, 
that the old wrapping will be going away?

I don't want to be stirring up controversy, I just want to solve a problem.

Gaetan Lehmann wrote:

> I'm not sure how to say that in english without seem too much 
> insistent,  but if you plan to modify the itk tcl code, you should 
> really do it on  WrapITK, or we will have to port your work from old 
> ITK wrapper, which is  quite useless IMHO.
> WrapITK is a *BIG* improvement for all languages compared to the old  
> wrappers, so there is no reason to continue to develop the old ones. 
> If  some improvements can be done for tcl, they should really be done 
> there.
>
> Luis, only to have an idea of what will happen, do you want to keep 
> the  wrapping system in ITK tree once WrapITK will be published to the 
> insight  journal ?
>
>