ITK/Tcons/Minutes/2011 03 18: Difference between revisions
From KitwarePublic
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
** Any name will work, we just don't want to make this large scale change many times. | ** Any name will work, we just don't want to make this large scale change many times. | ||
* We need to revisit the process of "Review" to accept new classes into the toolkit. | * We need to revisit the process of "Review" to accept new classes into the toolkit. | ||
* Insight Journal | |||
** Customize the build of ITK by passing a file with the list of modules that must be ON in order to support the paper. | |||
** Support the passing of Virtual machines. | |||
= Action Items = | = Action Items = | ||
Revision as of 14:22, 18 March 2011
Attendees
- Jim Miller
- Kent Williams
- Brad Lowekamp
- Xiaoxiao Liu
- Brad King
- Luis Ibanez
Project Topics
Technical Topics
- ITK Tree Structure
- Any name will work, we just don't want to make this large scale change many times.
- We need to revisit the process of "Review" to accept new classes into the toolkit.
- Insight Journal
- Customize the build of ITK by passing a file with the list of modules that must be ON in order to support the paper.
- Support the passing of Virtual machines.
Action Items
- Write documentation on how to take advantage of the current modularization
- Include use cases such as
- Prepackaging ITK for an application
- Combining ITK with other toolkits (e.g. VTK)
- Include use cases such as
