Minutes 101210: Difference between revisions
From KitwarePublic
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
** Problem: the Gerrit comments should be kept. | ** Problem: the Gerrit comments should be kept. | ||
*** but the reviewer's scores are not kept for subsequent patches. | *** but the reviewer's scores are not kept for subsequent patches. | ||
** What are the rules for Gerrit to consolidate review rates ? | |||
*** Particularly the +2 versus -2. | |||
**** We would prefer that negative reviews override positive ones. | |||
= Action Items = | = Action Items = | ||
* Luis / Kitware to look at windows machines issues with shared libraries openjpeg | * Luis / Kitware to look at windows machines issues with shared libraries openjpeg | ||
Revision as of 15:37, 12 October 2010
Attendees
- Bill Lorensen
- Ziv Zaniv
- Xiaoxiao Liu
- Wes Turner
- Jim Miller
- Hans Johnson
- Vincent Magnotta
- Luis Ibanez
- Sean Megason
- John Galeotti
Project Topics
- Reviewed plans for the Iowa meeting
- Retouched the Agenda
- Task order #1 (modifications ?)
Technical Topics
- Licensing
- Dashboard review
- Gerrit workflow questions
- How to manage patches that were modified ?
- Should a second patch require full review again ?
- Problem: the Gerrit comments should be kept.
- but the reviewer's scores are not kept for subsequent patches.
- What are the rules for Gerrit to consolidate review rates ?
- Particularly the +2 versus -2.
- We would prefer that negative reviews override positive ones.
- Particularly the +2 versus -2.
Action Items
- Luis / Kitware to look at windows machines issues with shared libraries openjpeg
