[Openchemistry-developers] GSOC2017 - Open Chemistry

Karol Langner karol.langner at gmail.com
Thu Mar 9 13:01:15 EST 2017


+openchemistry

I agree with Adam, if you're interesting then at this point the most
important thing is to get a feel for the library, poke around and maybe try
to work with the code a bit. That should allow you to think about how the
various projects can be approached and how much work will be involved.

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 6:12 AM, Adam Tenderholt <atenderholt at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> You should familiarize yourself with the existing parsers in the cclib
> repository on Github. There might be a few outstanding issues with existing
> parsers, so you should see about fixing those and submitting a Pull Request.
>
> There are also guidelines for the actual application process to GSoC with
> Open Chemistry. See http://wiki.openchemistry.org/Applying_to_GSoC.
>
> Let me know if you have any other questions.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Adam
>
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 12:12 AM Arpit Nandwani <arpit.nandwani at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello, I'm a computer science undergraduate student in the pre final
>> year of my college. I work on Python and PHP on a regular basis along
>> with javascript and MySQL/PostgreSQL on the frontend and the backend
>> in developing websites. I've even built a spider before in Python and
>> have some knowledge on web crawlers and parsers.
>>
>> I looked into the cclib projects mentioned on your page and fond them
>> really interesting. I'd like to work to refract and implement parsers
>> or chemistry content web crawler. It would really be helpful if
>> someone could guide me on how to proceed further so I can begin
>> working on it early on.
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/openchemistry-developers/attachments/20170309/7e0c0661/attachment.html>


More information about the Openchemistry-developers mailing list