[Insight-developers] Dashboard Cleanup : Timeout of Join Series in Dash11.kitware : 1, 722 Streaming WARNING messages

[Bradley Lowekamp]

Thanks for looking into that. It would appear the warning message there is printed out way too many times, when ITK_LEGACY_REMOVE is not defined. This is not at all important to the test. This message was added to let users know that the quagmire of updating a zero sized region had been defined. I suppose that the best behavior would be just to warn the users once per object instance of this improvement. This would require a member variable though. 

Can you think of a better way to warn the users of this situation?

Thanks,
Brad

On Jan 20, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Luis Ibanez wrote:

> Hi Brad
> 
> I logged in dash11 to run the test manually and to
> figure out what a reasonable time out would be for it.
> 
> 
> In doing so, I notice that this test is printing out a
> very large amount of text, that probably accounts
> for a good fraction of its long execution time.
> 
> 
> To be more specific:
> 
> The test is printing out about 19,000 lines of text,
> most of it is repetitions of the message:
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 492: WARNING: In /home/ibanez/src/Insight/Code/Common/itkImageBase.txx, line 288
> 492: Image (0x10e6750): Not executing UpdateOutputData due to zero
> pixel condition RequestedRegion:ImageRegion (0x10e6890)
> 492:   Dimension: 2
> 492:   Index: [0, 0]
> 492:   Size: [0, 0]
> 492:  BufferedRegion: ImageRegion (0x10e68b8)
> 492:   Dimension: 2
> 492:   Index: [0, 0]
> 492:   Size: [0, 0]
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> This same message is printed out 1,722 times     :-(
> 
> -
> 
> A)   Is that message significant to the test ?
> 
> B)   Could we run the test in a smaller image perhaps ?
> 
> 
> In its current form the test needs 160 seconds
> to run in this machine.
> 
> I'm increasing the timeout to 240 seconds,
> just to get the test to pass.
> 
> but we probably should reconsider the structure
> and purpose of this tests.
> 
> 
>    Any suggestions ?
> 
> 
>         Thanks
> 
> 
>             Luis
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Dave Partyka <dave.partyka at kitware.com> wrote:
>> Resending as I wasn't a member of insight-developers.
>> 
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Dave Partyka <dave.partyka at kitware.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> No objection here if it really takes that long to run. Granted that
>>> machine is pretty old/slow.
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> The test:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>          itkJoinSeriesImageFilterStreamingTest
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewTest.php?onlyfailed&buildid=519006
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>            Is timing out in dash11.kitware.
>>>> 
>>>> The current timeout is set to 120 seconds.
>>>> 
>>>> Does anybody has an objection to raising the
>>>> TIMEOUT value of dash11  ?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>   Thanks
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>        Luis
>>> 
>> 
>>