[CMake] cmake end user vs. developer rpath handling

[Zakrzewski, Jakub]

________________________________
From: CMake <cmake-bounces at cmake.org> on behalf of Eric Noulard <eric.noulard at gmail.com>
Sent: 10 October 2019 12:05
To: DIXON, MARK C.
Cc: cmake at cmake.org
Subject: [DKIM] Re: [CMake] cm?ake end user vs. developer rpath handling


> No they can't because the maximum size is burried into the binary ELF file,
> that why CMake "reserve" some space with many ";;;" in order to replace BUILD_RPATH with INSTALL_RPATH when doing
> 'install'.

Interesting.
So you're saying that this: https://github.com/NixOS/patchelf/blob/8cc2d64444b0946abb0009058865cd46165b69c4/src/patchelf.cc#L1288-L1319?
does not really work? (An honest question)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/attachments/20191010/03671e16/attachment.html>