spir.robert at gmail.com
Tue Jan 10 17:49:49 EST 2017
I made a simple portfile  for VTK to vcpkg and it seems that it works. At least I was able to build and run the sphere VTK example.
Only problem that I see is that VTK has large number of build configuration options and I don’t know how this could be handled with vcpkg (for example optional QT support).
From: vtkusers [mailto:vtkusers-bounces at vtk.org] On Behalf Of Dženan Zukić
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 4:42 PM
To: Ben Boeckel <ben.boeckel at kitware.com>
Cc: vtkusers <vtkusers at vtk.org>; ITK developer mailing list <insight-developers at itk.org>
Subject: Re: [vtkusers] vcpkg
If there is no undergoing effort to "port" VTK to vcpkg, we could go ahead and add ITK with VTKGlue disabled. Once VTK is added, we could turn on VTKGlue and make VTK a dependency.
P.S. I originally cross-posted this to ITK and VTK developers lists, but since I am only subscribed to VTK-users my message was bounced from VTK-developers. Hence this "merge" message including Francois' response.
9:45 AM (52 minutes ago)
to me, vtk-developers, ITK
Never heard of it before. It does look interesting. We could try to estimate how much work it would be to port ITK (and VTK?) to that platform. Since it supports CMake , it may not be much work.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Ben Boeckel <ben.boeckel at kitware.com <mailto:ben.boeckel at kitware.com> > wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 18:58:40 -0500, Dženan Zukić wrote:
> like a good effort for easing library installation for usage in Visual
> Studio. Should we join the effort by adding ITK and VTK? Has anyone
> tried/started doing this?
CPack would likely need to support it first. Moving VTK over to the new
superbuild would also help there.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the vtkusers