[vtkusers] marching cubes on an implicit surface
Jérôme
jerome.velut at gmail.com
Mon Jul 6 09:58:31 EDT 2009
Hi,
You may want to build such a pipeline :
vtkImplicitFunctionToImageStencil -> vtkImageStencil -> vtkContourFilter
It *should* do the trick... Yet I had never try it !
Best,
Jerome
2009/7/6 Christian Walder <chwa at imm.dtu.dk>
> Dear All,
>
>
> I am completely new to vtk, and I am hoping it can solve my problem:
>
>
> I have an implicit surface function mapping from R^3 to R (from three
> dimensions to a scalar value), and I would like to run a marching cubes
> type algorithm on it, to extract a mesh which approximates the zero
> level set of the function. In principle it should be possible to use
> some marching cubes library to do this by e.g. passing a pointer to the
> function which evaluates the implicit surface function, along with
> perhaps a bounding box and resolution, etc. However, from taking a quick
> look it seems that vtk can only do this for voxel data, ie for functions
> which are defined numerically on a 3D grid.
>
>
> Does anyone know if it is in fact possible to do what I want? If so, can
> anyone recommend a good reference or place to start?
>
>
> best regards,
>
>
> Christian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.vtk.org/pipermail/vtkusers/attachments/20090706/1240c90f/attachment.htm>
More information about the vtkusers
mailing list