[vtkusers] RE: How to compute intersection between surface polydata in vtk?

[Lohs, Uwe]

Dear Goodwin, dear Jean-DO,
 
I tried to understand your messages about intersection between 
polydata surface. I have to seperately mark the intersection of
a delaunay generated polydata field and a sphere object.
 
 
1.
 
I am not so familiar with CMAKE, what do I have to do to compile
 
vtkBioeng.zip
 
I don't know how to deal with CMAKE for a seperate project.
 
2.
 
Am I write that the version which is currently http://www.bioengineering-research.com/vtk/vtkCollisionDetectionFilter.htm <http://www.bioengineering-research.com/vtk/vtkCollisionDetectionFilter.htm>  is working for VTK 
lower equal version 4.5 but not for VTK 5.0

(I am not successfull in getting a C++ Builder version for VTK 5.0 because 

Borland does not create object files for the *.txx files)

 

(Nevertheless where can I get the latest version of vtkBioeng.zip.  

 

3.

Anyone of you knows, why the result of the delaunay2D feeded with ctkPoints

does not include any scalars and that therefor I do not have a chance to colour

my Polydata?

 

IThanks in advance Yours

 

Uwe  

 


  
 
 
To close this discussion, and for the record on the vtkusers list, in 
case other people are interested.
Jean-Do
(Thanks Goodwin, and the best for your thesis...)

Goodwin Lawlor a écrit :
> Hi Jean-Do,
>
>> Last two questions:
>> - the classes you developed are really great, especially as there's 
>> nothing comparable (as I know at least) in the standard vtk library. 
>> Did you ever consider to make it part of the standard vtk library (I 
>> can hardly believe people at Kitware are not interested)?
> I'd have no problem if the class was a part of the standard lib... 
> though I wouldn't like to commit to long term support of the class.
>> - what's the deal if I want to develop a commercial application using 
>> your vtkCollisionDetection class?
> I'm putting the classes up on sourceforge.net under a BSD licence- "do 
> whatever you like with the code, free of charge, but don't blame me if 
> anything goes wrong"
>
> I've got a vtk wrapper class of the RAPID CD library... it would use 
> more memory (since it has its own data structure for models) but is 
> probably quicker for large models. I've been meaning to write a quick 
> report comparing the two classes. I've got a thesis to write, so its 
> on the backburner...
>>
>> Cheers anyway, and thanks again
>
> You're welcome.
> Regards,
>
> Goodwin
>> Jean-Do

...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.vtk.org/pipermail/vtkusers/attachments/20060428/4c944602/attachment.htm>