[vtkusers] c# port of VTK

[Prabhu Ramachandran]

>>>>> "SMI" == Sean McInerney <seanm at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> writes:

    SMI> Hi Prabhu,
    SMI>    I didn't address the issue of virtuals and inheritance
    SMI>    within the
    SMI> wrapper language since I would most likely implement a
    SMI> subclass in C++ and then wrap the derived class. I would be
    SMI> willing to guess that this is not everyone's preference and
    SMI> that such users might prefer to extend VTK in their non-C++
    SMI> language of choice.

    SMI>    Am I understanding the problem?

Yes, but from what I understand this (extending in the target
language) is important when you want a complete port to the .net
environment.  The idea is that you can extend the library in any
language of your choice and not merely write it in C++ and wrap it.  

I just wanted to mention that there are similar issues when generating
the wrappers to any of the currently supported languages.

cheers,
prabhu