[vtkusers] Mac OSX and VTK 4.0 question
nsmith5 at gl.umbc.edu
Tue Sep 24 04:52:42 EDT 2002
Aye, being almost 5 in the morning I tend to forget such things. My
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Charl P. Botha wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 04:30:58AM -0400, Nathan Smith wrote:
> > CMake rocks.. if its not working for you then you need to learn it better.
> > This isn't rocket science, but I don't think anyone ever claimed that
> > programming with C++ and dynamic libraries/build trees/etc was easy. Learn
> > CMake, and it will become your friend. If your running into compilation
> > problems, its probably not CMake's fault, but the options given to it to
> > compile and/or the programs its using (g++ for one). Try using the expert
> > mode in ccmake, and muck around with the options there.
> Uhm, if you'd read the mail, you'd note that I'm not the one shooting it
> down. Please address your mail to the correct party. :) Personally, I think
> cmake is one of those things that compare very favourably to sliced bread.
> In addition, try not to top-quote. It tends to make archived mails almost
> impossible to follow.
> > On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Charl P. Botha wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 12:13:34PM +0930, John wrote:
> > > > so we have 2 votes now for VTK to dump CMake !
> > >
> > > Excuse me? I'm assuming this is a joke... :)
> charl p. botha http://cpbotha.net/ http://visualisation.tudelft.nl/
More information about the vtkusers