[vtkusers] parametric (Bezier) surfaces

[Goodwin Lawlor]

I thought subdivision surfaces are the "way forward"??



Tim Hutton wrote:
> 
> Oo, wouldn't it be nice if VTK had support for Bezier and NURBS surfaces?
> Just think...
> 
> There was someone asking about NURBS surfaces on the vtkusers list a while
> back, there is definitely interest.
> 
> (hoping to inspire someone into action)
> 
> At 19:09 17/01/2002 +0300, Dennis wrote:
> >Hello!
> >
> >Are parametric (e.g. Bezier) surfaces implemented in VTK?
> >
> >If no why? Are there some problems with them?
> >
> >And  what  is  the best way of their implementation? I'm talking about
> >the  best place in class hierarchy and visualization pipeline. I guess
> >it  must  be  a  sort of filter converting control points to polygonal
> >representation. But what are control points in terms of VTK classes?
> >
> >--
> >Best regards,
> >  Dennis
> >
> >mailto:    denis at tversu.ru
> >ICQ:       21938733
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >This is the private VTK discussion list.
> >Please keep messages on-topic. Check the FAQ at:
> ><http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/vtkfaq>
> >Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> >http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This is the private VTK discussion list.
> Please keep messages on-topic. Check the FAQ at: <http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/vtkfaq>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers