[vtk-developers] [ANNOUNCE] New module system landing

[Ben Boeckel]

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 14:42:07 -0500, Sean McBride wrote:
> And is it your intention to not bring back this ignoring?

If there are warnings we cannot otherwise fix, yes.

> Getting all the many third party libs as warning-clean as VTK proper
> is a pretty Herculean task.  Meanwhile, all those third party warnings
> stop us from seeing VTK warnings.  If no one is doing the former, why
> should we lose the latter?

Looking at the warnings for one of the rogue machines:

    https://open.cdash.org/viewBuildError.php?type=1&buildid=5719051

it looks like, we just need to ignore the `[0-9]* warnings? generated`
regex to exclude those that are matched yet. Does adding that to
`CMake/CTestCustom.cmake.in` (in the general section), help with the
output?

--Ben