[vtk-developers] MR to reindent VTK's braces

[David Gobbi]

Is anyone working on the Doxygen changes, though?  Unless we have some idea
of when it's going to be done, it shouldn't be influencing decisions about
other merges.

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Berk Geveci <berk.geveci at kitware.com> wrote:

> I agree with Dave's (DeMarle) argument that we should do this at the same
> time as the Doxygen changes. It would be annoying to have two merge
> barriers in a manner of a few months.
>
> -berk
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:42 AM, David Cole <DLRdave at aol.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Automatic even. ;-)
>>
>> Daves on the VTK lists unite!
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:00 AM, David Gobbi <david.gobbi at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > In general, I'd love to see VTK move to regularly-scheduled minor
>> releases
>> > with firm dates set months in advance :)
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Berk Geveci <berk.geveci at kitware.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> One way or another it would be great to choose & announce a date for
>> >> merging this. That way, people with existing work will know when
>> potential
>> >> conflicts are coming.
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 9:29 AM, David E DeMarle <
>> dave.demarle at kitware.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I want to do a release soonish only because:
>> >>> * 7.0.0 is getting long in the tooth and I've not found any time to do
>> >>> 7.0.1
>> >>> * It is helpful for ParaView releases if VTK has a recent release to
>> work
>> >>> from, and PV 5.2 is expected month or so from now.
>> >>>
>> >>> Why shouldn't we do this now?
>> >>> * the doxygen update will also be a disruption, so we should combine
>> so
>> >>> people only go through the pain once
>> >>> * my vague feelings about whether this should be in a minor release
>> or a
>> >>> major release, and we know we want a major release very soon.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> David E DeMarle
>> >>> Kitware, Inc.
>> >>> R&D Engineer
>> >>> 21 Corporate Drive
>> >>> Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
>> >>> Phone: 518-881-4909
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 9:10 AM, David Cole <DLRdave at aol.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> It would seem better to bite the bullet and do it now unless there is
>> >>>> an extremely urgent deadline for 7.1......
>> >>>>
>> >>>> D
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Ben Boeckel <ben.boeckel at kitware.com
>> >
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 09:02:09 -0400, David E DeMarle wrote:
>> >>>> >> How about after 7.1 final then.
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> That and the reworking of doxygen will disrupt pretty much
>> everyone's
>> >>>> >> existing branches, so better to come out first as part of 8.0.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > No, because any branch which is meant for 7.1 then needs two
>> versions:
>> >>>> > one for master (post-cleanup) and another for 7.1 itself
>> >>>> > (pre-cleanup).
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > --Ben
>> >>>> > _______________________________________________
>> >>>> > Powered by www.kitware.com
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> >>>> > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Search the list archives at:
>> >>>> > http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtk-developers
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> >>>> > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
>> >>>> >
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>> >>>
>> >>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> >>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>> >>>
>> >>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=
>> vtk-developers
>> >>>
>> >>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> >>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/vtk-developers/attachments/20160908/c7099f9b/attachment.html>