[vtk-developers] MR to reindent VTK's braces

Berk Geveci berk.geveci at kitware.com
Thu Sep 8 10:49:06 EDT 2016


I agree with Dave's (DeMarle) argument that we should do this at the same
time as the Doxygen changes. It would be annoying to have two merge
barriers in a manner of a few months.

-berk

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:42 AM, David Cole <DLRdave at aol.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> Automatic even. ;-)
>
> Daves on the VTK lists unite!
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:00 AM, David Gobbi <david.gobbi at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > In general, I'd love to see VTK move to regularly-scheduled minor
> releases
> > with firm dates set months in advance :)
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Berk Geveci <berk.geveci at kitware.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> One way or another it would be great to choose & announce a date for
> >> merging this. That way, people with existing work will know when
> potential
> >> conflicts are coming.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 9:29 AM, David E DeMarle <
> dave.demarle at kitware.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I want to do a release soonish only because:
> >>> * 7.0.0 is getting long in the tooth and I've not found any time to do
> >>> 7.0.1
> >>> * It is helpful for ParaView releases if VTK has a recent release to
> work
> >>> from, and PV 5.2 is expected month or so from now.
> >>>
> >>> Why shouldn't we do this now?
> >>> * the doxygen update will also be a disruption, so we should combine so
> >>> people only go through the pain once
> >>> * my vague feelings about whether this should be in a minor release or
> a
> >>> major release, and we know we want a major release very soon.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> David E DeMarle
> >>> Kitware, Inc.
> >>> R&D Engineer
> >>> 21 Corporate Drive
> >>> Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
> >>> Phone: 518-881-4909
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 9:10 AM, David Cole <DLRdave at aol.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> It would seem better to bite the bullet and do it now unless there is
> >>>> an extremely urgent deadline for 7.1......
> >>>>
> >>>> D
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Ben Boeckel <ben.boeckel at kitware.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 09:02:09 -0400, David E DeMarle wrote:
> >>>> >> How about after 7.1 final then.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> That and the reworking of doxygen will disrupt pretty much
> everyone's
> >>>> >> existing branches, so better to come out first as part of 8.0.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > No, because any branch which is meant for 7.1 then needs two
> versions:
> >>>> > one for master (post-cleanup) and another for 7.1 itself
> >>>> > (pre-cleanup).
> >>>> >
> >>>> > --Ben
> >>>> > _______________________________________________
> >>>> > Powered by www.kitware.com
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> >>>> > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Search the list archives at:
> >>>> > http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtk-developers
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> >>>> > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
> >>>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Powered by www.kitware.com
> >>>
> >>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> >>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> >>>
> >>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=
> vtk-developers
> >>>
> >>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> >>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/vtk-developers/attachments/20160908/015244ca/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the vtk-developers mailing list