[vtk-developers] amber10 legacy

[David E DeMarle]

I've marked it as not-expected.

Rob - once you decide if the change should be permanent, please don't
forget to commit the change to amber10.bat to the repo.

David E DeMarle
Kitware, Inc.
R&D Engineer
21 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
Phone: 518-881-4909


On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Berk Geveci <berk.geveci at kitware.com>wrote:

> This is correct. Let's just remove the expected line from CDash.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Marcus D. Hanwell <
> marcus.hanwell at kitware.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:52 AM, David E DeMarle
>> <dave.demarle at kitware.com> wrote:
>> > Before I look into it, does anyone know why amber10 legacy stoppped
>> > submitting to the vtk nightly expected section on April 4'th?
>> >
>> I think Rob may have removed it as we were investigating failures of
>> amber10 due to possible overloading issues. Several other machines
>> turn on legacy remove, as I remember it we decided to see if amber10
>> did better with a few of its submissions disabled.
>>
>> Marcus
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/vtk-developers/attachments/20130410/87662e36/attachment.html>