[vtk-developers] amber10 legacy

Berk Geveci berk.geveci at kitware.com
Wed Apr 10 10:53:20 EDT 2013


This is correct. Let's just remove the expected line from CDash.


On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Marcus D. Hanwell <
marcus.hanwell at kitware.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:52 AM, David E DeMarle
> <dave.demarle at kitware.com> wrote:
> > Before I look into it, does anyone know why amber10 legacy stoppped
> > submitting to the vtk nightly expected section on April 4'th?
> >
> I think Rob may have removed it as we were investigating failures of
> amber10 due to possible overloading issues. Several other machines
> turn on legacy remove, as I remember it we decided to see if amber10
> did better with a few of its submissions disabled.
>
> Marcus
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/vtk-developers/attachments/20130410/d1751fd6/attachment.html>


More information about the vtk-developers mailing list