[vtk-developers] Science module directory

[Aashish Chaudhary]

If we create Domains directory, then I have some inclination on moving
Geovis underneath it.

Thanks,


On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:18 AM, David Gobbi <david.gobbi at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Will,
>
> "DomainSpecific" captures exactly the right idea.  But maybe shortened
> to "Domains".  So just like there is a "FiltersGeometry" module, there
> could be a "DomainsChemistry" module.
>
>  - David
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Will Schroeder
> <will.schroeder at kitware.com> wrote:
> > George-
> >
> > You said it in your email, how about "DomainSpecific" instead of
> "Science" ?
> > Science is too narrow a term, I can see all sorts of domains that are not
> > really science, more engineering or data-related.
> >
> > W
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:50 PM, George Zagaris <
> george.zagaris at kitware.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Moving AMR under Filters seems reasonable. We may need to have AMR and
> >> ParallelAMR under Filters for serial and parallel implementations
> >> respectively (right now everything depends on parallel).
> >>
> >> I think a top-level "Science" or similar directory would be useful.
> >> Right now, it is not clear where domain-specific code should go. I can
> >> see it grow with, Chemistry, Cosmology, CFD, etc.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> George
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Marcus D. Hanwell
> >> <marcus.hanwell at kitware.com> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 6:42 PM, David Gobbi <david.gobbi at gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> Hi All,
> >> >>
> >> >> In Modular, I've noticed that Chemistry, Charts, Geovis, AMR only
> have
> >> >> Core.  I'm wondering if people have opinions about where they could
> >> >> go, to reduce the number of directories at the root.
> >> >>
> >> >> My thoughts are:
> >> >>
> >> >> Science/Chemistry
> >> >> Filters/AMR
> >> >> Rendering/Charts
> >> >> Rendering/Geovis
> >> >>
> >> >> It seems that Views also belongs in Rendering, but it already has
> >> >> subdirectories other than Core.
> >> >
> >> > I was trying to think of a good top level container for some of these
> >> > modules. I agree that Chemistry, Charts, Geovis and AMR all seem like
> >> > candidates for being moved. If we had Science that could be good for
> >> > future growth, although right now swaps one top level for another.
> >> >
> >> > If anyone can think of anything appropriate for three or four of them
> >> > that would be great. There are a lot of modules in Rendering, and I
> >> > would love to use a different top level for more specialized rendering
> >> > types/implementations.
> >> >
> >> > Marcus
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Powered by www.kitware.com
> >> >
> >> > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> >> > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> >> >
> >> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> >> > http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Powered by www.kitware.com
> >>
> >> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> >> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> >>
> >> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> >> http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > William J. Schroeder, PhD
> > Kitware, Inc.
> > 28 Corporate Drive
> > Clifton Park, NY 12065
> > will.schroeder at kitware.com
> > http://www.kitware.com
> > (518) 881-4902
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
>
>


-- 
| Aashish Chaudhary
| R&D Engineer
| Kitware Inc.
| www.kitware.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/vtk-developers/attachments/20120410/bbadd34c/attachment.html>