[vtk-developers] Science module directory

George Zagaris george.zagaris at kitware.com
Mon Apr 9 21:50:16 EDT 2012


Moving AMR under Filters seems reasonable. We may need to have AMR and
ParallelAMR under Filters for serial and parallel implementations
respectively (right now everything depends on parallel).

I think a top-level "Science" or similar directory would be useful.
Right now, it is not clear where domain-specific code should go. I can
see it grow with, Chemistry, Cosmology, CFD, etc.

Best,
George

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Marcus D. Hanwell
<marcus.hanwell at kitware.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 6:42 PM, David Gobbi <david.gobbi at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> In Modular, I've noticed that Chemistry, Charts, Geovis, AMR only have
>> Core.  I'm wondering if people have opinions about where they could
>> go, to reduce the number of directories at the root.
>>
>> My thoughts are:
>>
>> Science/Chemistry
>> Filters/AMR
>> Rendering/Charts
>> Rendering/Geovis
>>
>> It seems that Views also belongs in Rendering, but it already has
>> subdirectories other than Core.
>
> I was trying to think of a good top level container for some of these
> modules. I agree that Chemistry, Charts, Geovis and AMR all seem like
> candidates for being moved. If we had Science that could be good for
> future growth, although right now swaps one top level for another.
>
> If anyone can think of anything appropriate for three or four of them
> that would be great. There are a lot of modules in Rendering, and I
> would love to use a different top level for more specialized rendering
> types/implementations.
>
> Marcus
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
>



More information about the vtk-developers mailing list