[vtk-developers] Attempting topic merge

Glenn Faken glenn.faken at gmail.com
Wed Feb 23 01:04:49 EST 2011


That does help clear things up. The gerrit code 'git gerrit-push' that was
added doesn't work though. Git claims that its not a command that it
supports. I did find some instructions at this link that worked
http://public.kitware.com/Wiki/ITK/Gerrit. When doing the git remote command
I changed it to VTK instead of ITK and then followed the rest of it. I did
mess up on the commenting and I'll have to see if I can clean that up. So
the code is now up for review.

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com>wrote:

> Of the two methods, I would recommend using Gerrit. It is more likely
> to be reviewed by more people.
>
> Bill
>
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Marcus D. Hanwell
> <marcus.hanwell at kitware.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:48 PM, David Doria <daviddoria at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Glenn Faken <glenn.faken at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> Part of our course is to try and get any code that we fix merged in
> with
> >>> the official release. If not that is ok but it would be like extra
> brownie
> >>> points if we could. Would using those other sites be a good first step
> and
> >>> then move on to official? From looking at the git turturial it looked
> like
> >>> when you make a topic it was kind of like a side off shoot that I could
> mess
> >>> around with and then when I push it to git it would then evaluated. If
> the
> >>> code didn't mess anything up then it would be moved onto the next stage
> till
> >>> it was apart of the main code. I guess the way I read it made it seem
> like
> >>> its my own playground until somebody approved the changes.
> >>
> >> Glenn,
> >>
> >> The "official" entry process is through Gerrit as of late. You have to
> >> push to Gerrit and have a couple of people approve the changes. Only
> >> then can you push to master.
> >>
> > That is not correct, if you do not have push access (which we don't
> > give straight away) then either sharing topics on Github/Gitorious or
> > pushing your commits to Gerrit is the only way to get your changes
> > looked at. Then emailing the development list asking for a review is a
> > good way to go. If you use Gerrit then some of us, such as myself, get
> > emailed whenever a VTK commit is pushed.
> >
> > Once it is approved then one of us would need to merge it. If you
> > continued to contribute changes, and the quality was good, then we
> > would look at giving greater privileges to directly merge your changes
> > using the stage. Is that clearer?
> >
> > http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK/Git/Simple
> >
> > I added a brief section about basic use of Gerrit to push a topic
> > branch (taken from ParaView's page).
> >
> > Marcus
> > --
> > Marcus D. Hanwell, Ph.D.
> > R&D Engineer, Kitware Inc.
> > (518) 881-4937
> > _______________________________________________
> > Powered by www.kitware.com
> >
> > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> >
> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> > http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
>
>


-- 

Glenn Faken
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/vtk-developers/attachments/20110223/c7b46985/attachment.html>


More information about the vtk-developers mailing list