[vtk-developers] VTK moving to Git
andrew.amaclean at gmail.com
Tue Mar 23 19:00:48 EDT 2010
I have been using mysysgit with no major problems. Make sure you use
the latest update. It works Ok with SVN repositories too.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Michael Halle <mhalle at bwh.harvard.edu> wrote:
> Does Gitorious' AGPL license matter for the purpose you describe?
> I was actually surprised to see that git didn't have a good non-cygwin
> windows port:
> Have you found this limitation significant during Kitware development?
> On 3/22/10 9:38 AM, Berk Geveci wrote:
>> Yes it was. The killing blow for Mercurial was the fact that there is
>> nothing like Gitorious (I mean the software not the service) for it.
>> We would like to setup Gitorious here and modify it so that we can
>> include it in our software development process.
>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Charl Botha<c.p.botha at tudelft.nl> wrote:
>>> On 22 March 2010 01:23, Berk Geveci<berk.geveci at kitware.com> wrote:
>>>> It shouldn't be a problem to keep github around. At least until we
>>>> have our own gitorious running.
>>> <asbestos anti-flame suit on>
>>> Was mercurial also considered as DVCS alternative? Certain unnamed
>>> companies who tend to do their research chose mercurial over git:
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> Powered by www.kitware.com
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
Andrew J. P. Maclean
Centre for Autonomous Systems
The Rose Street Building J04
The University of Sydney 2006 NSW
Ph: +61 2 9351 3283
Fax: +61 2 9351 7474
More information about the vtk-developers