[vtk-developers] Virtual methods in VTK classes

[John Biddiscombe]

If it were me, I'd virtualize all the ones I need and if I thought somone will probably need another few, then do them too.

JB

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charl P. Botha [mailto:c.p.botha at ewi.tudelft.nl]
> Sent: 01 July 2003 12:26
> To: VTK Developers
> Subject: RE: [vtk-developers] Virtual methods in VTK classes
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 13:16, John Biddiscombe wrote:
> > Nope, if things need to be made virtual, then it should be done.
> > Thery're only non-virtual now because noone's got around to
> > subclassing and needing them.
> 
> Thanks for the comments John.  A remaining question is then: if I am
> going to start virtualising base methods, how do I decide which to
> virtualise and which not?  I might need one or two overrides 
> in my child
> class, but someone else might need more.
> 
> My current thougts are to virtualise everything, except for 
> very simple
> setters and getters.  Even that is not hard and fast though.
> 
> -- 
> charl p. botha http://cpbotha.net/ http://visualisation.tudelft.nl/
> _______________________________________________
> vtk-developers mailing list
> vtk-developers at vtk.org
> http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
>