[vtk-developers] A question about coverage

[Berk Geveci]

I fixed the problem on caemlyn. The tests were not running. You should
see much better coverage tomorrow.

-Berk

On Sun, 2002-05-12 at 08:22, Bill Lorensen wrote:
> The gcc coverage facility is used. Your test  is running on Mandrake but not Caemlyn. Check the coverage there. Something is messed up with caemlyn's checkout.
> 
> Your coverage is not too bad. There are a couple of methods not covered. Perhaps you can change the test to exercise those methods also.
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> At 01:35 PM 5/12/02 +0200, Rasmus Reinhold Paulsen wrote:
> >Following the dashboard I have noticed that some classes has a very low
> >coverage, including vtkPCAAnalysisFilter that I have contributed. 
> >Offcourse, I would like to increase the coverage of this class, but I need
> >some advice on how to do it.
> >
> >First a basic question: Is it Rational PureCoverage that is used? Can
> >someone give me a short introduction to what it does? I suspect that it
> >traces which source lines that are executed during regression testing. Is
> >that correct?
> >
> >
> >I can see that it is caemlyn.kitware that is used to perform the coverage
> >test, but it seems that the PCA class is not tested on this machine?
> >
> >Regards,
> >Rasmus
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >vtk-developers mailing list
> >vtk-developers at public.kitware.com
> >http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> vtk-developers mailing list
> vtk-developers at public.kitware.com
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers