Improving vtk (was RE: [vtk-developers] vtknew tree and testing / examples)

[Prabhu Ramachandran]

>>>>> "DG" == David Gobbi <dgobbi at irus.rri.ca> writes:

    DG> In my opinion, some (many?) of the current examples function
    DG> poorly as examples of 'good VTK coding' and that is part of
    DG> the reason for wanting to move most of them into 'Testing.'  I
    DG> think a few good examples is better than a whole bunch of poor
    DG> ones.  Also, a good Testing script should cover extreme cases
    DG> that are unlikely to pop up in application code.

Makes sense.

    DG> It's the people that do VTK for fun that are the real
    DG> troublemakers ;)

Okay, okay, I'll keep quiet now. :)

prabhu