[Smtk-developers] SMTK's CMB plugins

[Ben Boeckel]

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 14:11:22 -0500, David Thompson wrote:
> I am good with #2 or #3. My only concern with #3 is that then SMTK's
> "ParaView support" could run into problems down the road. (E.g., we
> write a PV plugin to expose SMTK readers in PV that is independent of
> ModelBuilder; then we would need those plugins to reside in the SMTK
> repo again.)

There's no reason they couldn't be separate plugins though, right?
Making *ParaView* plugins in SMTK is fine since SMTK requires ParaView
in that case, but CMB plugins are a circular dependency.

--Ben